Comparative analysis of estimates of the breeding value of carp (Cyprinus carpio) of the Chuvash scaly and Anish specular breeds
https://doi.org/10.36038/0131-6184-2025-4-98-104
EDN: NZWUWM
Abstract
The article presents the results of an analysis of the calculated genetic and phenotypic correlations between the commercial length and live weight of the Chuvash scaly and Anish mirror carp breeds. The analysis of breeding value by live weight and commercial length of both breeds is carried out. It was found that the genetic relationship between length and weight was stronger in the Anishka mirror breed – 0.83 and 0.74 in the Chuvash, which may indicate the best breeding potential of the first breed. However, it should be noted that the phenotypic correlation in both breeds had a negative close value (-0.70 and -0.72), which confirms the strong influence of external factors that offset the genetic predisposition. The above analysis revealed a significant variability in the breeding value of the Anish mirror carp. According to the highest EBV values, two individuals had the highest productivity – 0.73±0.12 and 0.50±0.12, several individuals with a range of 0.08-0.12 had the average potential, and the majority were low-yielding individuals (EBV <0.08±0.12). According to the fishing length, two different individuals with EBV 2.98±0.81 and 1.73±0.81 cm were identified. The capras of the Chuvash scaly breed showed more modest indicators (the maximum EBV in live weight was 0.25±0.12, and in commercial length 1.98±0.81). In commercial length, the Chuvash scaly carp shows good potential and can be valuable breeding material for purebred breeding.
About the Authors
P. S. IlyushinaRussian Federation
Polina S. Ilyushina – specialist
142460, Moscow region, Noginsky district, village named after Vorovsky, Sergeeva St., 24
P. I. Otradnov
Russian Federation
Pyotr I. Otradnov – Junior Researcher
142460, Moscow region, Noginsky district, village named after Vorovsky, Sergeeva St., 24
A. S. Mamonova
Russian Federation
Anastasia S. Mamonova – Senior Researcher
142460, Moscow region, Noginsky district, village named after Vorovsky, Sergeeva St., 24
A. A. Belous
Russian Federation
Anna A. Belous – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Director
142460, Moscow region, Noginsky district, village named after Vorovsky, Sergeeva St., 24
References
1. Fedorov E.V. (2017). Economic efficiency of growing fingerlings of carp and herbivorous fish in pond farming in Almaty region of Kazakhstan// Bulletin of the AGTU. Ser: Fisheries. No. 3. Pp. 80-58. https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5529-2017-3-80-88. (In Russ.)
2. Maslova N.I. (2019). Genetic markers in carp breeding // Genetics. Vol. 55. No. 5. Pp. 612-620. (In Russ.)
3. Gjedrem T. (2012). Genetic improvement for the development of efficient global aquaculture: A personal opinion review // Aquaculture. Vol. 344-349. Pp. 12-22
4. VanRaden P. M. (2008). Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions // Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 91(11). Pp. 4414-4423. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0980
5. Vandeputte M., Haffray P. (2014). Parentage assignment with genomic markers: A major advance for understanding and exploiting genetic variation of quantitative traits in farmed aquatic animals // Frontiers in Genetics. Vol. 5. P. 432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00432
6. Nguyen N.H. (2016). Genetic improvement for important farmed aquaculture species with a reference to carp, tilapia and prawns in Asia: Achievements, lessons and challenges / Fish and Fisheries. Vol. 17(2). Pp. 483-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12122
7. Hayes B.J., MacLeod I.M., Daetwyler H.D. [et. al]. (2014). Genomic prediction from whole genome sequence in livestock: The 1000 bull genomes project // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014. Vol. 111(48). Pp. E5279-E5288
8. Gjoen H.M, Bentsen H.B. (1997). Past, present, and future of genetic improvement in salmon aquaculture // ICES Journal of Marine Science. Vol. 54(6). Pp. 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10/1016/S1054-3139(97)80005-7
9. Kitaev I.A., Tyulin D.Yu., Brigida A.V., Lippo I.E. (2023). Characteristics of the ichthyofauna reproducing in the middle zone of the Volgograd reservoir from 2017 to 2022. // Veterinary medicine and feeding. No. 2. Pp. 29-32. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATTVK-1814-9588-2023-2-7. EDN AYRHAO. (In Russ.)
10. Lippo I.E., Brigida A.V., Elizarova A.S. [et al.] (2023). Monitoring of hydrochemical parameters of water during algolization of reservoirs // Veterinary medicine and feeding. No. 6. Pp. 31-34. https://doi.org/10.30917/ATT-VK-1814-9588-2023-6-7. EDN EANSHR. (In Russ.)
11. Lippo I. E., Kitaev I.A., Brigida A.V. (2024). The experience of using the pituitary gland of the clary catfish in the spawning campaign of carp // Bulletin of Omsk State Agrarian University. No. 4(56). Pp. 162-169. EDN ZSXFES. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ilyushina P.S., Otradnov P.I., Mamonova A.S., Belous A.A. Comparative analysis of estimates of the breeding value of carp (Cyprinus carpio) of the Chuvash scaly and Anish specular breeds. Fisheries. 2025;1(4):98-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/0131-6184-2025-4-98-104. EDN: NZWUWM
























