Effects of dietary Lactobacillus brevis 47f on growth performance, hematological and histological parameters of juvenile sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus)
https://doi.org/10.36038/0131-6184-2024-4-96-107
Abstract
In this work, a study was conducted on the possibility of using the probiotic strain Lactobacillus brevis 47f in feeds for juvenile sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus). The preservation of lactobacilli in manufactured feeds and the survival rate of the strain on the mucous surface of the intestines of fish were established. In a long-term experiment (60 days), an increase in the number of lymphocytes in the blood was revealed, as well as a change in histomorphometric parameters: the number of lamina propria lymphocytes, the number of goblet cells. There was a significant decrease in the feed coefficient, as well as an increase in sterlet biomass in the experimental group, probably associated with a change in protein metabolism – an increase in the level of total protein, albumin, globulin in blood serum. The conducted studies have shown the possibility of using a number of histomorphometric data to assess the reaction of the gastrointestinal tract in sturgeon fish to feed with a probiotic strain. The results obtained suggest that the probiotic strain L. brevis 47f is promising for use in aquaculture.
About the Authors
N. I. KochetkovRussian Federation
Nikita I. Kochetkov – Junior Researcher, Faculty of Biotechnology and Fisheries; Laboratory of Microbial Genetics
109004, Moscow, Zemlyanoy Val str., 73; 119333, Moscow, GSP-1 Moscow, Gubkin str., 3
D. L. Nikiforov-Nikishin
Russian Federation
Dmitry L. Nikiforov-Nikishin – Candidate of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Faculty of Biotechnology and Fisheries; Laboratory of Microbial Genetics
109004, Moscow, Zemlyanoy Val str., 73 ; 119333, Moscow, GSP-1 Moscow, Gubkin str., 3
S. V. Smorodinskaya
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Smorodinskaya – Head of the Laboratory, Faculty of Biotechnology and Fisheries; Laboratory of Microbial Genetics
109004, Moscow, Zemlyanoy Val str., 73; 119333, Moscow, GSP-1 Moscow, Gubkin str., 3
A. A. Klimuk
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Klimuk – junior researcher at the Aquaculture Center of the Faculty of Biotechnology and Fisheries; Laboratory of Microbial Genetics
109004, Moscow, Zemlyanoy Val str., 73; 119333, Moscow, GSP-1 Moscow, Gubkin str., 3
N. A. Golovacheva
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Golovacheva – Candidate of Veterinary Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Biology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Biotechnology and Fisheries
109004, Moscow, Zemlyanoy Val str., 73
References
1. Doumas B. T. et al. (1981). A candidate reference method for determination of total protein in serum. I. Development and validation // Clinical chemistry. Vol. 27. No. 10. Pp. 1642-1650.
2. Reiner M. (ed.). (2012). Standard methods of clinical chemistry. – Elsevier. Vol. 1.
3. Agatova A. I. et al. (1991). Hydrochemist’s handbook: fisheries – M.: Agropromizdat. (In Russ.)
4. Lugert V. et al. (2016). A review on fish growth calculation: multiple functions in fish production and their specific application //Reviews in aquaculture. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 30-42.
5. Schindelin J. et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis //Nature methods. Vol. 9. No. 7. Pp. 676-682.
6. Bankhead P. et al. (2017). QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis // Scientific reports. Vol. 7. No 1. Pp. 1-7.
7. Kochetkov N. et al. (2023). Ability of Lactobacillus brevis 47f to Alleviate the Toxic Effects of Imidacloprid Low Concentration on the Histological Parameters and Cytokine Profile of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) //International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Vol. 24. No. 15. P. 12290.
8. Suvarna K.S., Layton C., Bancroft J.D. (2018). Bancroft’s theory and practice of histological techniques. – Elsevier health sciences.
9. Sula E. et al. (2020). Digital light microscopy as a tool in toxicological evaluation of fish erythrocyte morphological abnormalities //Microscopy Research and Technique. Vol. 83. No. 4. Pp. 362-369.
10. Kochetkov N.I., Smorodinskaya S.V., NikiforovNikishin D.L. [et al.] (2022). Evaluating possible genotoxicity of three feed additives recommended for aquaculture by using micronucleus test on Danio rerio erythrocytes / // Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Fishing Industry. No. 3. Pp. 48-59. doi 10.24143/2073-5529-2022-3-48-59.
11. Ivanova N.T. (1983). Atlas of fish blood cells: Comparative morphology and classification of shaped elements of fish blood. – M.: Light and food industry. (In Russ.).
12. Knowles S. et al. (2006). Hematology and plasma chemistry reference intervals for cultured shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) // Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Vol. 35. No. 4. Pp. 434-440.
13. G.F. Metallov, E.N. Ponomareva, M.N. Sorokina [et al.] (2018). Functional orientation of biochemical processes in females of the sterlet×beluga hybrid (Acipenser ruthenus Linnaeus, 1758×Huso huso Linnaeus, 1758) in the reproductive cycle // Reports of the Academy of Sciences. Vol. 478. No. 6. Pp. 727-729. doi 10.7868/S0869565218060245. (In Russ.).
14. Asadi F. et al. (2006). Serum biochemical parameters of Acipenser persicus //Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. Vol. 32. Pp. 43-47.
15. Vasilyeva L.M., Sudakova N.V. (2018). Ways of development of aquaculture of sturgeon fish at the present stage //Astrakhan bulletin of ecological education. No. 5. Pp. 66-76. (In Russ.).
16. Artyukhin E.N. Sturgeon. (2008). Ecology, geographical distribution and phylogeny. – S.Pb: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University. 136 p. (In Russ.).
17. Barulin N.V. (2017). Strategy for the development of sturgeon breeding in the Republic of Belarus //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. A series of agricultural sciences. No. 2. Pp. 82-90. (In Russ.).
18. Reinartz R., Bloesch J. (2006). History and perspectives of “living fossils”(sturgeons) in the Danube River //Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen. Vol. 29. No. 3. Pp. 1703-1708.
19. Langlois L. et al. (2021). Fishing for the right probiotic: host–microbe interactions at the interface of effective aquaculture strategies //FEMS Microbiology Reviews. Vol. 45. No. 6. P. fuab030.
20. Wanka K.M. et al. (2018). Isolation and characterization of native probiotics for fish farming //Bmc Microbiology. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 1-13.
21. Tekebaeva J.B. et al. (2020). Probiotics and their use in aquaculture //Science news of Kazakhstan. No. 4. Pp. 170-185. (In Russ.).
22. Wang Y.B., Li J.R., Lin J. (2008). Probiotics in aquaculture: challenges and outlook //Aquaculture. Vol. 281. No. 1-4. Pp. 1-4.
23. Moroni F. et al. (2021). The effects of nisin-producing Lactococcus lactis strain used as probiotic on gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) growth, gut microbiota, and transcriptional response //Frontiers in Marine Science. Vol. 8. P. 659519.
24. Ruiz M.L. et al. (2020). Histological effects on the kidney, spleen, and liver of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus fed different concentrations of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum //Tropical animal health and production. Vol. 52. Pp. 167-176.
25. Marsova M. et al. (2020). The Lactobacillus brevis 47 f strain protects the murine intestine from enteropathy induced by 5-fluorouracil //Microorganisms. Vol. 8. No. 6. P. 876.
26. Marsova M. et al. (2018). A bioluminescent test system reveals valuable antioxidant properties of lactobacillus strains from human microbiota //World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. Vol. 34. Pp. 1-9.
27. Simón R. et al. (2021). Mechanisms used by probiotics to confer pathogen resistance to teleost fish // Frontiers in immunology. Vol. 12. P. 653025.
28. Sumon M.A.A. et al. (2022). Single and multistrain probiotics supplementation in commercially prominent finfish aquaculture: Review of the current knowledge //Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. Vol. 32. No. 6. P. 681.
29. Barišić J. et al. (2018). Evaluation of architectural and histopathological biomarkers in the intestine of brown trout (Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758) challenged with environmental pollution //Science of the total environment. Vol. 642. Pp. 656-664.
30. De Marco G., Cappello T., Maisano M. (2023). Histomorphological Changes in Fish Gut in Response to Prebiotics and Probiotics Treatment to Improve Their Health Status: A Review //Animals. Vol. 13. No. 18. P. 2860.
31. Chemagin A.A. (2018). Review of some aspects of sterlet ecology (Acipenser ruthenus Linnaeus, 1758) // Bulletin of the Astrakhan State Technical University. No. 2 (66). Pp. 115-122. (In Russ.).
32. Nikiforov‐Nikishin A. et al. (2022). The influence of probiotics of different microbiological composition on histology of the gastrointestinal tract of juvenile Oncorhynchus mykiss //Microscopy Research and Technique. Vol. 85. No. 2. Pp. 538-547.
33. Ramos M. A. et al. (2017). Dietary probiotic supplementation improves growth and the intestinal morphology of Nile tilapia //Animal. Vol. 11. No. 8. Pp. 1259-1269.
34. Adeoye A. A. et al. (2016). Combined effects of exogenous enzymes and probiotic on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth, intestinal morphology and microbiome //Aquaculture. Vol. 463. Pp. 61-70.
35. Adeshina I., Abubakar M.I. O., Ajala B.E. (2020). Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus enhanced the growth, gut morphometry, antioxidant capacity, and the immune response in juveniles of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio //Fish physiology and biochemistry. Vol. 46. No. 4. Pp. 1375- 1385.
36. Abdelhafiz Y. et al. Fish as the lesser-known counterpart to mammalian models to explore the biofunctionality of polyphenols //Journal of Functional Foods. 2023. Vol. 107. P. 105654.
37. Wolf J. C. et al. (2015). Nonlesions, misdiagnoses, missed diagnoses, and other interpretive challenges in fish histopathology studies: a guide for investigators, authors, reviewers, and readers //Toxicologic pathology. Vol. 43. No. 3. Pp. 297-325.
38. RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
39. Sevryukov A.V. et al. (2013). The effectiveness of the use of a symbiotic drug based on the Bacillus subtilis strain in 1895 in aquaculture and veterinary medicine //Current issues of veterinary biology. No. 4 (20). Pp. 49-56. (In Russ.).
40. Gorbunov A.V., Nikiforov-Nikishin D.L., Kalita T.L., Ponomarev A.K. (2022). Technologies of organic aquaculture – Moscow: FSUE “Academic Scientific Publishing, Production, Printing and Book Distribution Center “Nauka”. 431 p. ISBN 978-5-02-040946-0. (In Russ.).
41. Rombout J.H. W.M. et al. (2011). Teleost intestinal immunology //Fish & shellfish immunology. Vol. 31. No. 5. Pp. 616-626.
42. Tkacheva I.V., Tishchenko N.N. (2011). The use of probiotic preparations Subtilis and Sub-pro in compound feeds for sturgeon fish // Proceedings of the Kuban State Agrarian University. No. 28. Pp. 122-123. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kochetkov N.I., Nikiforov-Nikishin D.L., Smorodinskaya S.V., Klimuk A.A., Golovacheva N.A. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus brevis 47f on growth performance, hematological and histological parameters of juvenile sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus). Fisheries. 2024;(4):96-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36038/0131-6184-2024-4-96-107